The Sanford Governor dodges the difficult question

The Sanford Governor dodges the difficult question

As the regular readers of this blog know, one of my goals is to bring sharp political information and the analysis to the readers. One of the more popular examples of the EC than I speak can be found here.

Thus, in an effort to maintain this blog 'tradition of S, today I had the privilege to take part in a talk on line with the Sanford mark of the Governor of South Carolina.

Manner that functioned: You subject a question, the question is announced to the page, then the governor appears (one hour of late) and descends the list from questions, announcing his answers.

The majority of the participants raised questions about if it is controlled for the vice-president, its sights on expenditure of the government, how it thinks that President Bush will be considered by the history, all the dreck yawn-inducing political standard.

I subjected the following question:

��� Question: The governor, one to support truths of the policy is that the politicians never keep the promises which they made during the countryside. When will you live until your engagement to lock up in a box a kangaroo with the TV of phase?

In this moment I should specify that the talk moved slowly, but firmly, a total from perhaps three or four minutes between an answer and the next one. I sat down there patiently, the reading with the interest of the governor of the 's answers as it made his way by the list. It made its manner with my question. The tension built.

He answered the question above mine, and then. a very long delay. In this moment I thought that it could propose an intelligent answer, something funny, with the exposure which it has a direction of humour ( you have too much hour on your hands. ). Or perhaps, still better, it stumped and had called in a writer or two to discover if it had indeed undertaken such to countryside, and they would point out it that, not, it hadn 't, and it would publish a serious denial.

When I regenerated the page, I was astounded by what I found. Rather what benefits from a lively question which was completely obviously based on a lie, and shows its capacity to take a joke and to turn it to its advantage, the question was removed, Soviet-model.

Perhaps he didn 't want to address it whole, hoping to avoid the possibility that people would start to think that it would be good that it obtains in the ring with a kangaroo. Perhaps this has something to make with giving the hope which he is always a serious candidate for a slit of VP on the ticket of McCain.

Naturally, the governor forever made such an engagement, but 's no reason of him to be unaware of the idea completely there. It could do it for charity, but these didn 't even occur with him. Is it against the boxing of kangaroo for charity? The public must know.

I am not a political activist, thus I will close myself by saying that I believe sincerely that you should not CLICK ON HERE and send to the Sanford Governor a fast email asking why him 's against locking up in a box a kangaroo for charity. Seriously, put 't do it! Think of the consequences: So too many people were to send email, it could force this exit in the public stage and it could finish having to the top doing it. And certainly let us not want we that occurs, is not this?